Evolving the ONA
1 09

ONA Official Sigil
Here is more esoteric truth from a certain sinister group, which reveals – once again – that they have understood, and felt, the sinister essence, and embody this essence in a new form appropriate to these current causal times of ours:
” To establish a footing or link to the causal realm, whereon each mind then expresses this Primal Dark Way in its own exoteric manner. If we resonante with the Dark Current, submerge ourselves in the Abyss, and yearn for the wisdom of the Way, it will come. As if Nature Herself whispers Her Dark Mysteries to you without need of master or prophet. And in the end, no matter who or where we are, Our Dark Tradition manifests itself in the same exoteric form. This Sinister Way of ours is a Way we learn directly from Primal Nature Herself, which is the core essence all casaul life. This Sinister Way, needs no teacher or preacher; no prophet or guru; it just comes naturally to those who are Chilldren of Primal Nature, who still dance to her wild music.” http://onanxs.wordpress.com/2009/01/24/agia-h-baphomet/
They also have – with one point of contention, which I shall elucidate later – a burgeoning awareness of how the currently perceived outer (exoteric) Order of Nine Angles needs to change, or, rather, to evolve:
” If the ONA doesn’t change, find equilibrium, and update it system to the 21st century it is doomed to die out eventually. The main problem with the ONA right now is that it is to too heavily contaminated with testoterone and it lacks perspective of primal nature. “
However, it is my view (and that of some other ONA Initiates) that they – and others like them – are this very change; they are the continuation of the ONA which is now, as a living-nexion, evolving and transforming, to become some-thing other than what it was. Here, we might introduce several somewhat Old Aeon similes, such as that they – and others like them – are the new vigorous growth of transplanted cuttings taken from the ‘ONA tree’; or, perhaps sometimes more apt and accurate, that they – and others like them – (as one ONA associate recently wrote) in their difference, similarities and divergences, are sometimes antagonistic and quarrelling family members; the young, chic, beautiful sister, perhaps, and the thoughtful, more intellectual, more traditionalist older brother, who – despite such occasional (or lengthy and maybe even sometimes emotional) disputes and differences, are still ‘family’, and who will in their turn give rise to other progeny who will, no doubt, diverge from and be different from, they themselves.
The esoteric reality is that the ONA is now a kind of magickal entity in its own right. Fluid; changing; growing; transmuting. It is not a static, purely, causal thing; it is a living, evolving, entity, partly causal, partly acausal. Which is why no person – or even a group of persons – now ‘owns’ the ONA, and never did; not even Anton Long. He was just a means of presencing certain energies; someone with certain abilities who was given, from his Lady Master, the knowledge and means to open a new nexion to what was already existing, ‘on the other side’ (the sinister; the acausal); someone who over a few decades kept the new nexion open, and who (through various writings, and deeds) increased the presencings of acausal energies through that new nexion. Now, the acausal energies have spread out; affecting and effecting and inspiring others in many diverse ways. This is why physical ‘membership’ of a causally existing organization named The Order of Nine Angles is quite irrelevant. Why, now, ‘who or what’ Anton Long was – or is – is quite irrelevant. Why there is no such thing as an ‘inner ONA council’ (or whatever) who and which decide ‘policy’, or whatever, for – to use an Old Aeon metaphor – the ONA is a genuine manifestation of the genuine Left Hand Path, in which Path there may be some guidance, from others who have travelled along The Way, but in which the individual has complete freedom to act they desire, to believe as they feel or reason that they should, and where there is no absolute, or even relative, morality, and no subservience to others, or to some dogma or ideology. For it is practical experience, and personal character and ability, which are important.
The Sinister Feminine Principle
In the matter of the one point of contention mentioned previously, it is my view that the ONA does not now lack, and never has lacked, “the perspective of primal nature”, and what follows from that and which, in truth, is an intrinsic part of it, which is the feminine.
However, what was – and to some extent still is – missing is not only an exoteric understanding and appreciation of this hitherto esoteric (and rather neglected) aspect of the ONA, but also its further development by others of, or influenced by, or affected by, or infected by, the ONA, by the ONA mythos. That is, there is certainly more work to be done to further explicate, to elucidate, to presence, this aspect of the sinister mythos.
In this context, it is worth reprinting here part of an ONA MS.
The Sinister Feminine Principle in the Works and Mythos of the ONA:
One of the most noticeable (and neglected) aspects of the ONA mythos is the predominance given to what may be termed the Sinister Feminine Principle, evident, for example, in what the ONA calls the rôle, and Magickal Grade, of Mistress of Earth, and in its depiction of, and homage to, the Dark Goddess Baphomet, whom the ONA describe as one of the most powerful of The Dark Gods.
Thus, in the Occult fiction of the ONA, the main character – the main protagonist, the “hero” – is often a powerful, beautiful, woman, with ordinary men, more often than not, manipulated by, or somehow subservient to, these women who belong to or who identify with some ancient Sinister tradition, or the Left Hand Path, and Satanism, in general. For instance, in The Giving – which is probably the most forthright fictional portrayal, by the ONA, of a genuine Mistress of Earth – the heroine is Lianna: a wealthy, powerful, beautiful and mature woman, who is heiress of a sinister rural pagan tradition which involves human sacrifice. She is seen manipulating both Mallam and Thorold, and the story ends to leave the reader to answer the unanswered question as to whether she really contrived Monica’s death and used her sinister charms to beguile – “to beshrew” – Thorold following that death.
Quite often, in these stories, the Dark Goddess Baphomet is invoked directly – as for example in The Temple of Satan, and In The Sky of Dreaming. In the latter, we are left to speculate as to whether the always un-named alien female shapeshifter who returns to Earth is actually Baphomet herself, and there are several clues, scattered throughout the text, which might be used to answer this question. In other stories – such as Jenyah and Sabirah – we are presented with sinister, vampiric-like, entities who have assumed female form (or who have always had a female form in our causal world) and who have dwelt on Earth for millennia, using the “life-force” of human male victims to sustain themselves, and who can easily be regarded as “dark daughters of Baphomet”. All of these women are mysterious, enchanting – and physically powerful: for instance, the woman described in Sabirah easily overpowers the young men who attempt to molest her.
In general, such depictions – and the mythos of the ONA in general – may be said to empower women; to depict them in a way that has been long neglected, especially in the still male-dominated, materialistic, West. However, this empowerment, it should be noted, is based upon “the sinister”: upon there being hidden esoteric, pagan, depths, abilities and qualities in women who have an important, and indeed vital, rôle to play in our general evolution and in our own lives. Furthermore, it is one of the stated aims of the ONA to develope such character, such qualities, such Occult abilities, in women, and the following of The Seven-Fold Sinister Way is regarded as the means to achieve this.
Furthermore, the ONA’s depiction of such women – its explication of the dark feminine principle – is very interesting because it is a move away from, and indeed in stark contrast to, the “feminine principle” of both the political “feminism” which has become rather prevalent in Western societies, and that particular feminine ethos which many pagan and Wiccan “White-light” and Right Hand Path groups have attempted to manufacture.
This political feminism is basically an attempt to have women imitate the behaviour, the personality, the ethos, of men – which is what the strident calls for “equality” are essentially about, and as such it is often a negation of the character, and of those unique qualities and abilities, germane to women. The pagan and Wiccan type of feminism is most often about some dreamy, pseudo-mystical vision of a once mythical “perfect past” or about goody-goody types “harming none” – in stark contrast to the dark sinister goings-on of the ONA feminine archetype, which most obviously includes using sexual enchantment to manipulate those Homo Hubris type men “who deserve what they get…”
One of the central themes of the ONA’s Breaking The Silence Down is the nature of the dark goddess “manifest in or who can become manifest in women”, and there are many references, in ONA works, to a dark sorceress being one of the essential keys to “opening the nexion that allows The Dark Gods to return to Earth…”
It is also worth pointing out that not only is Myatt’s Numinous Way philosophy a keen, if somewhat mystical, appreciation of primal, numinous, Nature, but also that many involved with or associated with the ONA believe this ‘way of life’ (as David Myatt calls it) is a quite deliberate, conscious, creation (by an esoteric Adept – a certain Anton Long) designed to go some way to redress the balance that many intuitively, and some consciously, believe is lacking in the societies and ways of life of the modern world.
As an ONA associate wrote, not that long ago:
” My assumption, my personal view, and that of several other people I know, is that he crafted his Numinous Way for a specific very long term purpose, which is of providing a complete pagan “way” to enable some people to live beyond and independent of the current “System” (the New World Order and the like with its Magian values). That is, to create new communities and from them, over causal time, new dynamic and warrior tribes, for the ethic of personal honor, and the law of honor, are the ethical foundations of this new “way” of his. His development of this Way was – somewhat fortuitously – helped by his own recent personal experiences, of bereavement and the like, and this enabled him to create another persona for himself, or perhaps more accurately to more fully develop another aspect of himself (which was already there and evident in his poetry), which persona - that of a Nature loving mystic – some individuals can identify with and which then changes, inspires, them and leads them to do stuff and maybe develop this pagan way further and into new directions…..
So, I think this new mystical stuff is part of the “overall package” – of setting certain things in motion, if you like, which are or which will become useful to “us” (even though it “appears” to be of “light” and not of “the dark”) and which will certainly aid the creation of a New Aeon as well as aid the fight against the Old, Magian, Order. ” http://pointyhat.wordpress.com/myatt-the-ona-and-mysticism/
If this is so – and the matter is quite debatable – then this is a kindred nexion, presenced in a particular causal form, which is intended to provoke change and to give rise to further developments (‘new siblings’ à la the ONA as a living nexion).
Anton Long: Evil Genius?
1 09
David Myatt c.1989 e.n.
Almost exactly thirty-five years ago, David Myatt was interviewed by an enthusiastic student reporter for a local University newspaper, and the published account of the encounter appeared under the headline “Evil Genius”. This was Myatt’s second interview, and the young reporter was a certain Nick Witchell who would go on to have a very successful career in British journalism and broadcasting, becoming a familiar face on BBC Television where, for many years, he presented the main evening BBC news.
At the time of this interview, Myatt himself was in his early twenties and had not that long ago been released from jail after serving a prison sentence for violence, having been convicted of leading a gang of skinheads in a “racial attack” – what, at the time, was called ‘Paki-bashing’. Only a few months before this early interview, Myatt was the co-founder of a violent neo-nazi group, the NDFM (National Democratic Freedom Movement), which in the months after its founding had already been involved in a series of violent demonstrations and brawls and at whose meetings and public rallies Myatt was often the main speaker, known for his violent revolutionary rhetoric. Myatt was often to lead NDFM members in violent attacks on their opponents, with these attacks including twice smashing up an anti-apartheid exhibition, attacking ‘Red’ paper sellers, and assaulting members of a pro-communist Trades Union March, for which assault Myatt was arrested and convicted yet again, and which arrest and conviction was to be only one among many more for violence.
At the interview with Nick Witchell, Myatt was – as Witchell reported – accompanied by “two unidentified supporters, one of whom only became animated when violence was mentioned or discussed…”, and Myatt then already had an unsavoury reputation as not only a fanatic, a man of violence, but also as a Satanist.
The NDFM was to end, as it had begun, in violence – disbanded after Myatt’s arrest following another vicious mass brawl after Myatt had, for over half an hour, harangued a crowd of several hundred people (mostly communist supporters) from the top of the steps of Leeds Town Hall. Myatt would be sent to prison, again, for what was described as inciting and leading the violence on that occasion.
Almost exactly thirty-five years later, a certain Anton Long – regarded by many esoteric folk and all journalists as one of Myatt’s many pseudonyms – would yet again be publicly described, this time by a group of Satanists (WSA352), as “a genius”:
Whether this is literally meant, or is part of some sinister jape, some building of an icon only to, later on and dialectically, smash it (1), there is no doubt that in these thirty-five years the ONA has inspired literally thousands of people world-wide, significantly changing the way of life, and the way of thinking, of many people. David Myatt – aka Anton Long – himself has also directly influenced thousands of people in diverse ways, through his practical political and religious involvements, and through his political, religious, philosophical and literary writings.
It has been alleged, for instance, that he inspired David Copeland (2) whose bombs in London killed three people and seriously injured hundreds more. For many years one of Myatt’s articles defending and praising “suicide attacks” was on the Izz al-Din al-Qassam (the military wing) section of the Hamas website (3) whose members have killed many Jews in such attacks. Several of his articles praising and defending bin Laden – such as his The Aims of Al-Qaida and his In Reply to Sheikh Salman bin Fahd al-Oadah - have been widely circulated by Jihadists, and Professor George Michael has claimed that Myatt has “arguably done more than any other theorist to develop a synthesis of the extreme right and Islam.”
In the 1990’s and for many years into the first decade of the 21st century – before Myatt (in his guise as Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt) become publicly known as a radical Islamist and supporter of bin Laden and the Taliban – his Greek translations of Aeschylus, Sophocles, Sappho and Homer were often used by or referred to by Colleges, Universities and some American High Schools – for example by Sogang University, Korea; Suffolk University (Boston); and the University of Reading (UK).
His National Socialist writings have been translated into Swedish, Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Norwegian, Polish, Finnish, Serbo-Croat, and several other languages, and even as recently as a few days ago, one supporter of that particular political ideology wrote:
Even his – by sinister standards – innocuous poetry has its many admirers, one of whom was once moved to write:
The list of Long’s/Myatt’s influence goes on….. But what all these diverse influences reveal is an outpouring of creativity, by a single individual. That is, they do seem to reveal an “evil genius” at work; someone assuming diverse rôles, and diverse personae, in order to cause, or bring about, disruption, and change.
There is certainly, it seems, a propensity to be sinister; to sinisterly manipulate; to – as the quote above says – scatter “spores into the wind to spawn new mycellium…”.
There is, most certainly, a desire to infect the mind’s of others; most certainly a desire to get others to dream, to have and be inspired by and then develop a grand vision or even a personal mythos; a desire to have others realize and explore and develope their potential, as human beings – to evolve beyond what they are; and most certainly – and possibly most important of all – a desire to challenge the ‘old aeon’ type of thinking that stereotypes an individual by assigning to them some label and categorising them according to their perceived ‘political’ or ‘religious’ views.
In short, there is – to use a word often used by the ONA – a desire not to be a mundane; a desire to challenge, to be genuinely heretical and perplexing. A promethean desire to be like gods; to emulate the diabolical heresy of Satan. A desire to form better, complete, strong, free, unique individuals.
For many of the individuals affected or influenced by Myatt’s/Long’s personae, writings, and ideas, their psychic Myattian infection lasts only a short time; perhaps some months; often a year or so; occasionally, longer. Then, they return to or resume their life among the mundanes. For some others, however, the infection will have changed them, often profoundly, giving them a new perspective on life; new visions and dreams. Others, instead, will revert to being mundanes.
But what matters for Myatt/Long is stimulating, provoking, causing, change – not especially ‘in society’ (that is a bonus), but in individuals; in changing, transforming, the very basis of our human nature, and it was to cause this change, this transformation, that he created what is perhaps his most sinister, and most effective, means, and a pure expression of his ‘evil genius’: The Order of Nine Angles.
For, rather than trying to personally maintain control of this creation of his, he released it (or rather, them) – like some fledgling symbiotic demons – out into the world, having given them a life, a mission, a purpose, all of their own. Now, one can imagine him, like a true Satanic Master, smiling as his now grown demons – true shapeshifters, and succubus and incubus – breed not only progeny of their own, but hybrids with human beings.
As Anton Long also once wrote (4):
PointyHat
January, 120 (Year of Fayen)
Footnotes
(1) Anton Long has never taken himself too seriously, for instance writing that
He also wrote:
As someone once commented:
(2) Shortly after Copeland’s conviction for murder, a BBC Panorama programme about Copeland featured Myatt, claiming that Myatt was the person who had the most influence on Copeland. Several newspapers also published articles about the link between Myatt and Copeland, with one publishing a large photograph of Myatt on its front-page and stating that:
(3) Martin Durham: White Rage: The Extreme Right and American Politics. Routledge, 2007, p.113 ISBN 0415362326
(4) Preface to Presencing the Dark: The Weird Life of Anton Long, dated 114yf
Filed in Anton Long, David Myatt, Left Hand Path, O9A, ONA, Order of Nine Angles, Satanism, Sinister Comment, Sinister Opinion, The Dark Tradition, Traditional Satanism
Tags: O9A, Order of Nine Angles, The Dark Tradition